[urq] Urq, WX, Head Problems, etc.
QSHIPQ at aol.com
QSHIPQ at aol.com
Sun May 20 11:47:23 EDT 2007
Not pro, but a lot of btdt here. Get the sodium filled valves, they are
designed to *not* have heat spikes by spreading the heat thru the valve via
sodium. SS valves are ok, and what most 'other' turbo manufacturers use because
they are cheaper than sodium. I wouldn't use 034 experience here, I would
expect Javad to blow up a lot of things as he bullies those I5 motors until
something gives. That doesn't at all mean that at 300ATWHP on a 10vt, that a
sodium valve isn't appropriate. IME, sodium valves, with enough abuse, will do
what all valves do when they fail. I also wouldn't build an I5 turbo motor
without them.
Regarding monies, 700 for a rebuild sounds reasonable to me for good
workmanship.
HTH and my .02
Scott J
In a message dated 5/19/2007 11:46:53 P.M. Central Standard Time,
larichard at plguide.com writes:
JP,
Your mechanic may be right: 25 years later, maybe new SS valves are cheaper
and still good enough for high-temp turbo operation. Another point of view
is the traditional "over-engineering" Audi put in these cars; maybe
sodium-filled valves are the way to go to render these engines bulletproof
(and we know they are), but for a car that will not see track duty, and
being used as a week-end ride, I wouldn't be scared by a new set of SS
valves. In fact, the bottom end is still 25 years old.
700$ for a rebuilt ? In my book, that is very reasonable, as I spent the
same amount (in CDN$) just for the welding work and the valve seats (valves,
springs, retainers and guides were re-used).
I'd like to hear the point of view of the pro mechanics among us: Scott ?
Martin ? Ado ? Jim ?
Louis-Alain
************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
More information about the urq
mailing list