[urq] Too much Crankcase ventalation?
QSHIPQ at aol.com
QSHIPQ at aol.com
Wed Sep 5 12:40:24 EDT 2007
Dave
The reason the valve cover is tied to the PCV system at all, is to present a
dead air space for drainback, that's part and partial to this type of design,
that dead air space is to allow the oil vapors to separate from the any raw
oil. I don't believe that modifying the PCV valve to have protection
against ingesting roiling valve cover oil from the valvetrain is really that hard.
Audi did a great job of it on the double walled 5k's. I've seen a lot of
turbo/SC applications that don't ingest oil.
I had a 12 second GLH turbo, my wife drove regularly. Never had a catch
can, never needed it, no windage tray either.
PCV is only a problem, because audi didn't do a good design with the 20vt,
and to date on these forums, catch cans are the easy answer. I look at closed
loop PCV as the given answer, and figuring out the problem of getting it
designed right as the problem. In Ben's case IMO, it's a simple matter of
getting back to the original vacuum balance. I just don't see that as a catch can
problem. I'm also a firm believer that venting to atmosphere PCV reduces
the service life of oil. You need vacuum to pull off the vapors as apposed to
re-saturating them in aerated oil.
Is some sort of design change necessary? Yes. Does it dictate that
performance gains will come from a catch can? No. Does it dictate that a proper
PCV circuit shouldn't and won't ingest oil? Yes. Can it be done properly?
Sure. Audi actually has a few SAE articles specifically on the I5 oiling that
are worthy of read wrt this discussion. Given Ben's abilities, I'd bet he
can get this right without using a catch can.
My 02
SJ
In a message dated 9/5/2007 11:21:21 A.M. Central Daylight Time, Djdawson2
writes:
Before we start slapping me around for having a fast pig (they call them
"Razorbacks" down here in NW Ar-kansas)... let's remember that the weight of
said pig has nothing to do with anything at all. That powerful I-5 20v could be
bolted to my piggy, or bolted to a go-kart frame... it is irrelevant.
What is relevant is the fact that when significant acceleration occurs, oil
will go where it is not wanted. As stated before... to me, this has little
to do with the breather/PCV setup, and much more to do with poor oil control
within the engine... both valve cover and pan.
SO... the stock breather/PCV system WILL AND DOES work fine... if you are OK
with the concept that your turbo will be inhaling oil now and then. If you
are not OK with that, some modification will have to be made to allow the oil
to separate from the ventilation flow, and drain back to the crankcase...
prior to any chance of that oil being drawn into the intake charge.
Now what king of guy would let his sig-o anywhere near a 12 second street
car... let alone ask her to empty his catch can? ;)
Dave
************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
More information about the urq
mailing list