[urq] Engine rebuild?
dgraber460 at aol.com
dgraber460 at aol.com
Sat Jul 11 05:39:52 PDT 2009
I missed the first part of this thread.
What was it doing that you pulled the head?
First glance;
1 the plugs look terrible
2 cylinder walls appear to have no cross hatch left
3 and there doesn't seem to be any of the usual cracks between valves.
Dennis
Denver
-----Original Message-----
From: Maurits Jonkergouw <urquattro at moregraphics.nl>
To: Audifans <urq at audifans.com>
Sent: Sat, Jul 11, 2009 5:48 am
Subject: Re: [urq] Engine rebuild?
Hi and thanks everyone who replied before!
The head is finally pulled for inspection and here are the results:
www.moregraphics.nl/quattro/engine.html
Back in 1989 @ 81K km, the block was rebuild with 2x oversized pistons (79,975
mm) (ETKA says 80 mm).
Is it still possible to machine to 3x oversize 80,50 mm WR pistons or could I
use the non-oversized (81 mm) pistons from MB or RR (3B etc.) instead, without
getting problems like compression etc. (i.e. 80,50 or 81 is the pretty much the
same volume-wise)
The head is obviously ready for rebuild but the cylinderblock looks pretty OK,
after the rebuild @ 81K it has done 313-81 = 232K km which still is pretty
much...
So now I'm thinking of rebuilding the head only and not the cylinders, whould
that be bad economy concidering the mileage?
Thanks again,
Regards,
Maurits
1986 quattro GV
_______________________________________________
Audifans urq mailing list
Manage your list connection: http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/urq
http://www.audifans.com/kb/List_information
Interested in helping make urq26 happen? Send an e-mail to urq list admin.
Pictures/Polls/Database at: http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/urquattro/
More information about the urq
mailing list