[urq] Locking diff actuators - some history of options
bob
bob at maxboostracing.com
Fri Feb 12 15:00:32 PST 2010
No, its not that critical at all. Theres plenty of leeway. Besides, if
thats a concern you can just power the solenoid for 100% duty cycle
(with the right solenoid) and alleviate that problem.
Bob
qshipq at aol.com wrote:
>
> The problem I see with solenoids is that without constant tension on
> that dog clutch, the timer circuit could be too late. The locking
> gear is very narrow, and very little 'relaxed' movement from fully
> locked on the dog fork, could prove catastrophic. Exploring a lot of
> options back in the day, I see no reason not to use the vacuum
> actuators with the 'smart-box' found under the rear seat of any 91-94
> rear quattro. It defaults to off when the car is shut off, has the
> 'smart light' system built into the switch and graphic panel, and has
> been in my 83 urq without a single repair for almost 10 years now.
>
> BTW, I also looked at having the manual locking levers built, which
> used spring tension and locking notches to keep the levers in their
> locked position. At the end of all the research and futzing around, I
> decided that Audi chose the right hardware for the job. IME, the best
> way to keep a vacuum actuator living a long life, is to replace it's
> mounting screws with stainless. The biggest failure with the
> actuators (other than overconfident mechanics thinking they won't
> break off the vacuum nipples with a clutch change), is the rusy screws
> eventually cause a crack in the housing, and it then fails. I have
> several actuators on cars over 10 years old, working just fine with SS
> mounting screws.
>
> More actualatorizing nerding
>
> Scott J
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bob <bob at maxboostracing.com>
> To: qshipq at aol.com
> Cc: cody at 5000tq.com; larichard at plguide.com; laraa at sympatico.ca;
> vittorio at mybares.com; urq at audifans.com; quattro at audifans.com
> Sent: Fri, Feb 12, 2010 4:46 pm
> Subject: Re: [urq] Locking diff actuators - some history of options
>
> Thats exactly right... in version 1.0, when you hit the diff lock
> button the solenoid engaged, but I found that with an adequate
> flogging they would eventually come undone. Version 2.0 had a timer
> circuit in it, that kept pulsing the solenoid a few times a second to
> keep it engaged, and it worked perfectly.
> Bob
>
More information about the urq
mailing list