[urq] urq in kansas city

[Ingo Rautenberg]

I'm also dismayed that they didn't even bother upgrading to the 8" wide
Ronals...
On Jan 4, 2011 5:40 PM, <dgraber460 at aol.com> wrote:
>
> With all the body dents, and paint issues, the only thing that makes the
car exceptionaly "valuable" is the 3B motor, of which there is _not one_
photo. With a 3B transplant the car is not stock and the low mileage is not
the usual draw. I must admit the interior is really nice, but for a car
that's not stock, I would replace that dash with an 85 CGT in a second. It's
easy and really dresses em up.
> It would be interesting to see pics of the undercarriage, and engine bay.
> Is that car in any of the registries kept by listers?
>
> Dennis
> Denver
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Kellock <ekellock at gmail.com>
> To: urq at audifans.com
> Sent: Tue, Jan 4, 2011 3:15 pm
> Subject: [urq] urq in kansas city
>
>
> Hmmm...
>
> ttp://kansascity.craigslist.org/cto/2142200960.html
>
> d
> _______________________________________________
> udifans urq mailing list
> anage your list connection: http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/urq
> ttp://www.audifans.com/kb/List_information
> Pictures/Polls/Database at: http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/urquattro/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Audifans urq mailing list
> Manage your list connection: http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/urq
> http://www.audifans.com/kb/List_information
>
> Pictures/Polls/Database at: http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/urquattro/
>