[urq] UrQ v 911

[dgraber460 at aol.com]

Very true for Ferrari ownership in the modern world. Back in the gas shortage 70's you could pick up a Ferrari for pennies on the dollar from a used car lot. Times have changed indeed!
I must admit that back in the day, I would not have opted for an URQ given the choice of a 911, and in my many years of contacts with URQ owners, I have only met one person that bought one new (and that was last week).
I think most of us own them now because of the relative amount of car and unique (read eclectic, and rare) nature of the beast for cost of entry. At least that's my excuse and I'm stickin to it.


Dennis 
Denver



-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Del Tergo <mdeltergo at hotmail.com>
To: urq <urq at audifans.com>
Sent: Wed, Nov 13, 2013 8:42 pm
Subject: Re: [urq] UrQ v 911


I thought blank checks and no questions asked were for the Ferrari folks!  
Pretty sure that and previous Ferrari ownership are required to get in line for 
the newer "limited" models.

> From: "Martin Pajak" martin at quattro.ca

 I look ever higher, afterall a new 911 was less than a quattro in 1983.
 Ur-q owners should be of the Porsche level where a blank check is signed,
 dated and presented without any questions asked... 
 I am sure then we could have all the spare parts we would ever want.. ;)

 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
Audifans urq mailing list
Manage your list connection: http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/urq
http://www.audifans.com/kb/List_information

Pictures/Polls/Database at: http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/urquattro/