[V8] The last ride By RGW
QSHIPQ at aol.com
QSHIPQ at aol.com
Wed Jul 2 13:40:56 PDT 2008
Ron
Noticed your comment regarding swapping the 3.6 ecu/harness into 4.2 for
more HP. More hp than the ABT 4.2 chip? The other question I would have is
that the 4.2 autobox motronic uses the WOT switch potentiometer for calculation
of load in shifting. I always considered that a good thing, and would make
me believe that if using the 3.6 auto on a 4.2 auto, you'd need to also swap
the transmission motronic over to the 3.6. Yes? After my recent re-education
on the 4.2 motronic, I'd be more inclined to put the 3.6 chip code into the
4.2 motronic, as there are some good redundancies in the 4.2 ecu/harness the
3.6 doesn't have.
Scott J
92 v8 4.2 auto w/ Abt chip
ex2ex
91 v8 3.6 auto stock (ex-Abt chipped ecu/trans ecu mounted to ecu bracket -
for sale)
In a message dated 7/2/2008 2:38:18 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
ron_01056 at yahoo.com writes:
>...
All so FYI, if you swap out the 4.2 ECU & wiring harness to a 3.6's you'll
get more HP.
The 3.6 ECU is mapped more aggressively than the 4.2's.
All so found under the driver side knee bolster & routed under the
firewall/rain deverter. Four coastal connectors, & only 3 for the standard cars.
>...
Ron
**************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for
fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)
More information about the V8
mailing list