[V8] ...warning....
Ed Kellock
ed.kellock at msn.com
Thu Nov 27 07:44:49 PST 2008
I have never been unhappy with any DOT V8 headlights. There are probably
two reasons for that: 1. my point of reference is my 91 Avant with those
same HORRID lights that your 87 had and 2. I have never driven with V8
euro lights.
Ed
the other Ed
in CO
the other one in CO.
sheesh
;-)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: v8-bounces at audifans.com
> [mailto:v8-bounces at audifans.com] On Behalf Of Roger Woodbury
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 8:12 AM
> To: 'Ed Dekker'; v8 at audifans.com
> Subject: Re: [V8] ...warning....
>
>
> I feel your pain. The '87 5000CS Quattro was an experiment.
> It was a car with high mileage and I drove it for a lot more
> miles before it finally developed terminal engine syndrome
> and terminal ground syndrome and went away. Never, and I
> mean NEVER had I experienced such terrible headlights.
>
> I replaced that car with an 89 200 Avant. And for THIS car
> there appeared European headlights which were separately
> relayed, both high AND low and BOTH sides separately.
> Amazing difference. Those headlights were installed by the
> dealer, by the way.
>
> My second V8 got Euro headlights, too.
>
> The current V8 has DOT headlights and so far I don't feel
> that there is any need to replace them.
>
> Technically European headlights are probably illegal here.
> But I know of no one who has a light meter thingy that will
> test the lumen output and in all the time that I have been in
> Maine, no one has ever really examined the headlights except
> to see if they work. I had European headlights in my'87
> Mercedes that I bought over the counter at the Mercedes'
> dealer parts department, and they were ordered directly from
> Mercedes. When they arrived, they were installed by the
> dealer, too. I doubt that they would do it today, though.
>
> Roger
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Dekker [mailto:dekkere at fuse.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 10:03 AM
> To: v8 at audifans.com
> Cc: rmwoodbury at roadrunner.com
> Subject: Re: [V8] ...warning....
>
> Good point. Except I'm still angry about the DOT headlamps
> on my '87 and
> '90 Audis. We were in a life-threatening position coming
> from the mountains
>
> down to Denver in heavy snow and rush hour traffic.
> Ed
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger Woodbury" <rmwoodbury at roadrunner.com>
> To: "'Ed Dekker'" <dekkere at fuse.net>
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 7:16 AM
> Subject: RE: [V8] ...warning....
>
>
> The tubing is MDOT and USDOT approved for use as brake lines.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Dekker [mailto:dekkere at fuse.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 12:16 AM
> To: v8 at audifans.com
> Cc: rmwoodbury at roadrunner.com
> Subject: Fw: [V8] ...warning....
>
> "This new tubing is very bendable by hand..." I hope the
> new tubing can
>
> take the brake pressure without bulging and eventually
> bursting. Bendable tubing (copper, aluminum and plastic)
> doesn't have the pressure rating of steel.
>
> I'll be surprised if they find a non-corrosive "salt" for
> clearing ice and snow.
>
> Wish you could coat the steel brake lines as well as Audi
> applies wax under the fenders and body. Properly applied,
> that wax does well at preventing corrosion. I had only one
> rusted fender on my '83 5000 at 15 years, but none on my '87
> 5000 or my '90 V8 at the same ages. None yet on my '97 A6.
> I think they missed waxing part of my '83 fender. The
> fenders, rockers and frame sections all are rusted away on my
> '88 Dakota. The US and
>
> Asians only now seem to be catching up to Audi's rust
> proofing. Ed Dekker
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger Woodbury" <rmwoodbury at roadrunner.com>
> To: "'Ingo Rautenberg'" <ingo.rautenberg at gmail.com>; <v8 at audifans.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 6:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [V8] ...warning....
>
>
> > Here in Maine is is now very different than in the olden days.
> >
> > We have an annual inspection and in order for the car to pass it
> > cannot be leaking anything from anywhere, no rust through
> on the body,
> > and everything that is supposed to be working when the car left the
> > factory, must be working at time of inspection: ie: no
> lights on the
> > dash.
> >
> > However in the past year there is now a new requirement for
> intact and
> > non corroded brake lines. What this means is that the car
> is put on a
> > lift and the brake lines are ALL inspected, and if anything
> is suspect
> > the car fails
> > and the brake lines must be replaced.
> >
> > There is amply good reason for this because for the past
> few years the
> > Maine DOT has been sanding and salting roads in the winter
> here using
> > some sort of
> > obnoxious stuff that melts the ice and snow all right, and
> also destroys
> > the
> > underpinnings of cars, beginning with but not limited to,
> brakelines.
> >
> > I have heard that they are changing the formula for this
> stuff because
> > so many people have complained...complete brake line
> replacement every
> > two years is simply not affordable for an awful lot of
> people here, me
> > included.
> >
> > There is also a new brake line material that is being used
> that is not
> > made of steel as the old ones were. This new tubing is very
> bendable
> > by hand and
> > will not rust out EVER. More expensive than the old
> fashioned steel but
> > infinitely better.
> >
> > Roger
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Audifans V8 mailing list
> > Send posts to: mailto:V8 at audifans.com
> > Manage your list connection:
> > http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/v8
> >
> > You can help keep the audifans site running by shopping at
> > http://audifans.com/shop/
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Audifans V8 mailing list
> Send posts to: mailto:V8 at audifans.com
> Manage your list connection:
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/v8
>
> You can help keep the audifans site running by shopping at
> http://audifans.com/shop/
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.10/1813 - Release
> Date: 11/26/2008 8:53 AM
>
More information about the V8
mailing list