Returned mail

[MAILER-DAEMON@ncrgw1.attgis.com]

Your mail could not be delivered because of the following reason:


   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
Executing: /usr/bin/uux - -gI  ncrhub4!rmail (columbiasc.ncr.com!daniel.adams)
uux failed ( -1 )
server "/usr/bin/uux" failed - unknown mailer error 1

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
>From quattro Fri Jan 27 16:49:52 0800 1995 remote from swiss.ans.net
Received: by swiss.ans.net id AA02632
  (5.67b/IDA-1.4.4 for quattro-outgoing); Fri, 27 Jan 1995 16:48:43 -0500
Message-Id: <v02110103ab4f44628b02@[132.236.150.18]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 1995 16:49:52 -0800
To: swiss.ans.net!quattro 
From: postoffice2.mail.cornell.edu!esw5 (Ernest Wong) 
Subject: Re: 4000q hp
Sender: quattro-owner@swiss.ans.net
Reply-To: quattro@swiss.ans.net

[from Joff]
[snip]

>They can get at least 200 BHP out of the five cylinder by increasing its
>capacity, fitting new cams and poished, airflowed ports. On the five
>cylinder 20 valve they were offering a 240 BHP conversion - of course you
>could get a lot more, but not with the day to day useability of this
>vehicle (according to Car Magazine). Apart from the extra power (and more
>importantly, the big torque increase), the engine didn't exhibit any of
>the characteristics of highly tuned motors - i.e., rough idle, dodgy
>cams, poor reliability and tardiness at low revs.
>
Any rough idea how much displacement the 200HP engine was running. I
remembered seeing displacement enhancing crankshaft and pistons advertised
for the inline 5. It bumped displacement to 2.5 liters. Forget if that
required boring out the cylinder walls.
Thanks,

Ernest Wong
email: esw5@cornell.edu