Returned mail

[MAILER-DAEMON@ncrgw1.attgis.com]

Your mail could not be delivered because of the following reason:


   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
Executing: /usr/bin/uux - -gI  ncrhub4!rmail (columbiasc.ncr.com!daniel.adams)
uux failed ( -1 )
server "/usr/bin/uux" failed - unknown mailer error 1

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
>From quattro Tue Jan 31 11:00:17 0800 1995 remote from swiss.ans.net
Received: by swiss.ans.net id AA11748
  (5.67b/IDA-1.4.4 for quattro-outgoing); Tue, 31 Jan 1995 14:00:47 -0500
X-Sender: eliot@homer02.u.washington.edu
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 1995 11:00:17 -0800 (PST)
From: u.washington.edu!eliot (Eliot Lim)
To: swiss.ans.net!quattro 
Subject: Re: 1993 90CS
In-Reply-To: <199501311354.AA08027@swiss.ans.net>
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.91c.950131104734.31432A-100000@homer02.u.washington.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: quattro-owner@swiss.ans.net
Reply-To: quattro@swiss.ans.net

On Tue, 31 Jan 1995 adams@churchill.columbiasc.ncr.com wrote:

> My first paragraph comes from _Gut_Fahrt_.  Which had an article 
> comparing the Audi V-6 to the VR6.  It was more acurate than Eliot's
> "why VR6 is the best engine in the world", and explained the differant
> purposes of these engines.

so _Gut_Fahrt_ is right because it says what you want to hear and i'm
wrong because i say what you don't want to hear.  very persuasive.

i guess you don't understand the concept that different
people/publications have different criteria for liking and disliking
things.


eliot