[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: turbo theories Part ???
Geez... and I thought superchargers were bad... This is REALLY bad!
On Mon, 20 Feb 1995, jim healey wrote:
> >
> > Regarding methods of maintaining boost between shifts, I recently came
> > ...
> > wings AND A COMPRESSED-AIR SYSTEM to prevent turbo impellor stall during
> > gear shifts."
> >
> >A few months back, Turbo and HiTech had a teaser on another approach --
> >mount a small high-speed electric motor onto the turbo . . .
> >
> >And of course the next step is obvious - use a slightly bigger motor and
> >you'll have boost even at idle.
> >
> >Finally, use a big honkin' motor and you can do away with the turbine
> >altogether! (pity the poor ole alternator...)
> >
> > -RDH
> >
> Now let me get this straight. We want to turn mechanical energy
> (rotating shaft) into electrical energy (alternator) and then back into
> mechanical energy (rotating shaft at compressor). Anybody want
> to work out the efficiency of this? Nahh, too simple - lets add a
> flywheel and maybe a viscous coupling, or maybe a stirling engine
> and a umm oohh, uggh . .
>
> oh nevermind, hey Bart, what are those little pink and green puppies
> you keep taking?
>
> :-)
> jim h
> >
>
>
/|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob D'Amato |Information and Technology Center
Southern New England Telephone |
Voice: 203-771-7081 |mx@starfleet.itc.snetlink.com
Fax: 203-773-3398 | or
Pager: Oh, I dont think so |bob.damato@starfleet.itc.snetlink.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------