[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: 4000Q Vs ur-Q
- To: quattro@coimbra.ans.net (Non Receipt Notification Requested) (IPM Return Requested)
- Subject: Re: 4000Q Vs ur-Q
- From: glen.powell@smc.com
- Date: 17 Mar 1995 07:28:40 -0500
- Autoforwarded: FALSE
- Importance: normal
- P1-Content-Type: P2
- P1-Message-Id: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLAN;X400ATT Mar 17 07:28:40 1995
- P1-Recipient: quattro@coimbra.ans.net
- Priority: normal
- Sender: quattro-owner@coimbra.ans.net
- Ua-Content-Id: 392807170395
- X400-Trace: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLANarrival 17 Mar 1995 07:28:40 -0500action Relayed
As has been pointed out, "standard" equipment varies quite a bit
depending on the target market for the car. My points were all relative
to US-spec ur-Qs and the '85 model in particular, 'cause that's the one
I'm most familiar with. YMMV.
-glen