[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: 944t
>the other rule of thumb is that 2.0 liters is the cut off point for
>acceptable levels of buzz. (which is why the unbalanced 2.4 pickup truck
>engine that nissan uses in the 240sx is so unacceptable for something they
>are trying to market as a "sports" car. how dumb the masses are) anything
>smaller than that one can absorb with soft engine mounts. the smaller
>honda 4's are smoother than many 5 and 6 cylinder engines, not because of
>good concept but because of good engineering.
Another example of why BIG fours are a bad idea is the 2.4/2.5 liter chrysler 4.
I had one of these in a rental car for a few days. It actually had a
satisfying amount
of get up and go for a cheap rental car, but the vibration made the whole
car seem
much cheaper than it would have otherwise. These engines have a great
reputation
for durability, but even so, I don't think I would want to live with one for
any length of
time.
------------------------------------------------------
Jason Douglas
MTS Dept G057
MITRE Corporation
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 944t
- From: joff <jjr21@hermes.cam.ac.uk>