[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: RD confiscation/destruction?
- To: quattro@coimbra.ans.net (Non Receipt Notification Requested) (IPM Return Requested)
- Subject: Re: RD confiscation/destruction?
- From: glen.powell@smc.com
- Date: 24 Mar 1995 15:52:00 -0500
- Autoforwarded: FALSE
- Importance: normal
- P1-Content-Type: P2
- P1-Message-Id: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLAN;X400ATT Mar 24 15:51:59 1995
- P1-Recipient: quattro@coimbra.ans.net
- Priority: normal
- Sender: quattro-owner@coimbra.ans.net
- Ua-Content-Id: 595115240395
- X400-Trace: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLANarrival 24 Mar 1995 15:52:00 -0500action Relayed
Good points all, Bart. Clearly, contesting this type of thing is not for
everyone. It's good to know I'm not *totally* alone on this though. I've
actually tried a case in Federal court before (lost & didn't appeal, but
didn't get any fine or any type of penalty or record whatsoever) and it
was definitely worth the experience. It gave me some real insight into
"how things work" and I'll never just pay a fine, etc. ever again, or
just "roll over and play dead". I might have lost that case, but it
instilled in me that we must all stand up for our rights and demand our
"day in court" and force the powers-that-be to fulfill their obligation
under our laws to give us our public hearings and prove us guilty beyond
a reasonable doubt. It's the states responsibility and obligation to do
that and we should not "let *them* off". Demand nothing less.
-glen
whoops, almost fergot, <Audi>