Re: unasked boost question

[bruceh@garlic.com (Bruce Hochuli (Ventana Computer Corp.))]

> 
>   Greetings All,
>     While it seems we've discused nearly all aspects of power increases 
> through greater boost etc. There has been little discussion of the 
> negative aspects.  How is valve-guide-seat longevity affected, or turbo 
> life expectancy.  The way I see it, if the Ur-qs can safely make 250+ HP 
> with just computer and boost mods then the engineers wouldn't have let 
> the car leave the factory with a measly 160hp. Does gas milage suffer 
> that dramatically? (not that I'm worried, but it could explain audis 
> conservative output, its sort of difficult to sell a car that gets 10 
> MPG). I have the highest regards for the Audi engineers, I bow my head and 
> give thanks to them each time I start my car (perhaps THIS is why MY UR-q 
> is reliable).  I figure the car was designed to make 160hp for a reason. 
> To me, I guess, these computer mods seem too cheap and easy... There must 
> be a catch..hmm.
>  Vorsprung Durch Skeptic
>  Rod Wiggins
>   <rwiggins@rs6000.baldwinw.edu>
> 
>  
I modified my 82TQC to ~250-260 hp 8 years and 100,000 miles ago. I have
had no problems with the engine or the driveline. I replaced the stock
clutch @ 125,000 miles. I average 19 mpg and have to pound the car to 
get it lower than that. MANY other things have broken or worn out, some
of which just amaze me (the gas tank for example). I think of the
drive train as bulletproof. I did have to replace the exhaust manifold
and its studs but I think that is considered normal for this car.
>