[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: IA prices - EPROM 'comparison'
- To: quattro@coimbra.ans.net (Non Receipt Notification Requested) (IPM Return Requested)
- Subject: Re: IA prices - EPROM 'comparison'
- From: glen.powell@smc.com
- Date: 18 Jul 1995 16:31:50 -0400
- Autoforwarded: FALSE
- Importance: normal
- P1-Content-Type: P2
- P1-Message-Id: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLAN;X400ATT Jul 18 16:31:50 1995
- P1-Recipient: quattro@coimbra.ans.net
- Priority: normal
- Sender: quattro-owner@coimbra.ans.net
- Ua-Content-Id: 503116180795
- X400-Trace: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLANarrival 18 Jul 1995 16:31:50 -0400action Relayed
Well, if Ned is just changing the "inputs" to the map,
then it is NOT an EPROM upgrade, is it?
We need to be real careful here, as different
models (ur-Q Vs 5000, 10V Vs 20V) may have very
different implementations. Could the person
that posted about the "no diff" found test
please specify the model and if Stage I or II?
Thanks,
-glen