[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: quattro-digest V3 #333
- To: "quattro@coimbra.ans.net" <quattro@coimbra.ans.net>
- Subject: Re: quattro-digest V3 #333
- From: Dave Eaton <dave.eaton@minedu.govt.nz>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 09:18:39 +0012
- Autoforwarded: false
- Disclose-Recipients: prohibited
- Hop-Count: 1
- Importance: normal
- In-Reply-To: <199604111752.NAA07166@coimbra.ans.net>
- Mr-Received: by mta MOEMR0.MUAS; Relayed; Fri, 12 Apr 1996 09:18:39 +0012
- Mr-Received: by mta CSAV10; Relayed; Fri, 12 Apr 1996 09:18:41 +0012
- Priority: normal
- Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net
- Sensitivity: Company-Confidential
- Ua-Content-Id: 11A462522500
- X400-Mts-Identifier: [;3239180912041996/A04519/CSAV10]
> The good ol' 100% locking diffs rule! Simple, light, reliable and =
> superior traction in slippery conditions Vs the Torsen. The only real =
> advantage I can see for the Torsen, if there is one, is that the =
> ABS-equipped cars disable the ABS when one or more mechanical-locking =
> diffs are locked. This means that one must decide between ABS -or- a =
> locked center diff when operating in rain/snow/ice, etc. I always lock =
> the center diff in these conditions (in rain only on the highway) on the =
> non-ABS Ur-Q, 4KQs, etc, but opt for the ABS in the 5KQs and run with =
> the diffs open. So, for heavy-duty conditions the 100% =
> mechanical-locking diffs are the way to go.
nope, don't agree. my ur-q with open diffs could be a real handful when punting hard. locking the centre diff solved the problem but didn't make the car nearly as responsive as my s2 with it's torsen (less understeer).
in addition the speed that the torsen reacts to changing surface conditions is much quicker than your ability to turn the diff lock!
in addition, the torsen puts more torque to the driven wheels (up to 75%) versus 50% with a locked centre diff.
-dave.