Re[2]: 4000 subwoofer options(long)

["Todd Candey" <tcandey@usr.com>]

     From 1 4ksq with a killer sound system already in it, to another, who 
     is it that is actually doing this system.
     All I can say is that for a multitude of reasons, under the seat is a 
     very bad idea. The rear deck is the absolute best way to go, and if 
     you would like to discuss how (BTDT) email me privately and I'll give 
     you a few tips.
     
     Todd Candey    85 4ksq
     USRobotics     89 90q
     Skokie, IL USA


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: 4000 subwoofer options(long)
Author:  dieckeaw@PLU.edu at Internet
Date:    5/2/96 02:44 AM


     
     
On Thu, 2 May 1996, PAT MARTIN wrote:
     
> The only part I see as a problem is the subframe bushings underneath.  Maybee 
> someone can hoist one up and see where they are in relation to the seat.  With
     
> a little welding I would think that it might be possible to box in a small 
> inclosure under the seat assuming the bushings aren't in the way.
     
I've thrown this option out.  With the subs firing from below the rear 
steats, the bass image would probably most stable of all the 
configurations, but it sounds too difficult to pull off.  I'd like to 
install the subs in the rear deck, using the deck as the baffle, and a 
small enclosure bolted to the underside of the deck, but that means 
cutting into that metal frame under the deck.  Is this thing important?  
Will it harm structural integrity if I cut into it?  I don't want to put 
anything under the seat, or behind the front seats on the floor.  I've 
got size 13 feet, and I had a heck of a time figuring out what to do whit 
them in the back of Pat's car whith those tubes on the floor!
     
One more question.  My friend and I are still having a debate over tire 
sizes.  Can the collective consciousness of the list confirm or deny that 
a 205/50-15 is close in overall diameter to a 195/60-14?
     
Thankx much,
     
-Adam