[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
"car" assessment of a6 2.8 30 valve
- To: quattro list <quattro@coimbra.ans.net>
- Subject: "car" assessment of a6 2.8 30 valve
- From: Dave Eaton <dave.eaton@minedu.govt.nz>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 16:21:30 +0012
- Autoforwarded: false
- Disclose-Recipients: prohibited
- Hop-Count: 1
- Importance: normal
- Mr-Received: by mta MOEMR0.MUAS; Relayed; Thu, 30 May 1996 16:21:30 +0012
- Mr-Received: by mta CSAV10; Relayed; Thu, 30 May 1996 16:21:32 +0012
- Priority: normal
- Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net
- Ua-Content-Id: 11A5F4151D00
- X400-Mts-Identifier: [;8930211630051996/A54809/CSAV10]
as someone else mentioned the other day, there is a comprehensive group test of the audi a6 30 valve 2.8 litre against the new bmw 528i, the lexus gs300 sport and the volvo 850t
in summary:
prices: (un uk pounds - ukp)
all with dual air bags, alloys, alarm/immobilser, anti-lock brakes, electric windows, stereo
lexus: 36,390 (auto, leather, electric seats, CD, cruise control)
volvo: 32,000 (with leather, electric seats, CD, cruise control)
audi: 29,950 (with quattro, leather, no aircon)
bmw 29,320 (with aircon, traction control, stereo, security)
performance:
turbo volvo better than the others, lexus last, audi/bmw very close
0-30 0-60 0-100
audi 2.7 8.4 22.0
bmw 2.3 8.1 20.2
lexus 4.4 11.6 28.9
volvo 2.9 7.3 18.1
engines:
size bore/stroke compres power torque
audi 2771 82.5/86.4 10.6 193/6000 207/3200
bmw 2793 84.0/84.0 10.2 193/5300 206/3950
lexus 2997 86.0/86.0 10.0 209/5800 203/4800
volvo 2319 81.0/90.0 8.5 250/5400 258/2400-5000
other:
weight w/base length width height
audi 1550kg 2692mm 4797 1783 1430
bmw 1515kg 2830mm 4775 1800 1435
lexus 1720kg 2780mm 4965 1795 1425
volvo 1500kg 2660mm 4670 1760 1390
handling:
audi over the bmw, lexus and volvo.
quote: "here's a result we didn't predict: it's the audi that's the most fun to hustle down an intricate back road. Though cornering grip is no higher than without quattro, this a6 turns in crisply, and can make small but satisfying adjustments to it's line in response to throttle changes".
ride:
bmw over the audi, lexus and volvo.
accomodation, comfort:
bmw over the audi, lexus and volvo.
audi has wind nosie and some road noise which is absent in the bmw.
driver apeal:
bmw over lexus, audi and volvo.
audi has some driveline shunt at low speeds. good shifters on the bmw and audi. audi seat adjusters are a "real pain". style of the audi cabin was rated best. cheap upholstery on the bmw. the lexus was opulent but "too much like an 80's sheraton foyer". audi rates poor for ventilation. lexus hifi ä lesson to the world".
conculsion:
4) lexus: "too expensive for it's performance or refinement".
3) volvo: good for it's practicality, safety and performance, poor ride and interior.
2) audi: "the audi is undoubtedly in it's best form here; even the s6 never handled this well. It's swift and highly involving to drive. But the dynamic rejuvenation can't cover it's slight lack of refinement, a quality the bmw has in spades".
1) bmw: "We might not be convinced by it's looks, but in it's ride/handling compromise and it's overall quietness, it has leapfrogged the competition convincingly, and we find it's weight saving measures admirable. Now it has the rear sapce the last model lacked, it's hard to justify putting ukp 30,000 into any other saloon.