Re[2]: 944T (951) reliability

[tcandey@usr.com]

     I'd like to know a bit more about this also.....
     
     
     --todd


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: 944T (951) reliability
Author:  Robert Houk - SMCC Bos Desktop Hardware <rdh@UrQ.East.Sun.COM> at 
~internet
Date:    6/26/96 11:27 AM


   Mandatory Q-List content:  951 engines will bolt in directly to the Quattro 
   (so there!).
     
Have you actually done this/seen first hand?
     
Engine mounts the same? Bell-housing the same? (Obviously different 
ECU) What vintage "Quattro"?
     
What an interesting idea . . .
     
                                        -RDH
Received: from usr.com (mailgate.usr.com) by robogate.usr.com with SMTP
  (IMA Internet Exchange 2.01 Enterprise) id 1D15A870; Wed, 26 Jun 96 10:43:03
-0500
Received: from coimbra.ans.net by usr.com (8.7.3/3.1.090690-US Robotics)
	id KAA25040; Wed, 26 Jun 1996 10:38:15 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by coimbra.ans.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA23347
for quattro-outgoing; Wed, 26 Jun 1996 11:29:54 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: coimbra.ans.net: majordom set sender to owner-quattro
using -f
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 11:27:29 -0400
Message-Id: <199606261527.LAA00385@urq.East.Sun.COM>
From: Robert Houk - SMCC Bos Desktop Hardware <rdh@UrQ.East.Sun.COM>
To: quattro@coimbra.ans.net
In-Reply-To: <199606261221.IAA02451@mh004.infi.net>
	(bartonc@mailhost.infi.net)
Subject: Re: 944T (951) reliability
Reply-To: rdh@UrQ.East.Sun.COM
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net
Precedence: bulk