[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
re:5kCSTQ Suspension
- To: " - (052)quattro(a)coimbra.ans.net" <quattro@coimbra.ans.net>
- Subject: re:5kCSTQ Suspension
- From: brv@chrysler.com
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 17:16:22 -0400
- Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 (22)
- X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=CHRYSLER/ADMD=IBMX400/C=US/;0041200001162333000002]
- X400-Originator: brv@odemxpr1.oddc.chrysler.com
- X400-Recipients: quattro@coimbra.ans.net
Scott wrote:
>Dave at GPR has H&R springs (says they'll only lower it about an
inch--is this true and is this still too low?), and recommends Boges
over Bilsteins. I hear the Boges wear out quickly though.
Are there any other good spring choices? Anybody found progressive
rate springs with minimal lowering? How do the Konis compare to Boge
and Bilstein?
I just installed (last week) a set of H&R progressives and Konis on my
86 5KCSTQ. The car is getting aligned as I type. My initial
impression with stock sized tires @ 35psi and a ridiculous alignment
setting is that the impact harshness increased a noticable amount but
the overall ride was pleasantly firm. The shocks are adjustable and I
have the fronts set at .75 turns and the rears at 1 turn from full
soft. I have not pushed the vehicle by any means given its current
state. However, since the roads here in Detroit are atrocious, it is
easy to get a reasonable assesment of ride.
I'v got 205/55/R16 D60A2's coming next week so my impression is
subject to change..
I went with Konis over the other brands mentioned because they are
adjustable and i got a super deal on them. Sice my job is ride and
handling development, I can't leave well enough alone and prefer
adjustability. On our shock dyno, the rears had over 100% change in
rebound damping fron soft to hard. This leaves plenty of room for
tuning. Now if they only made them in the sport model which adjust
with a knob from the top/side....it would be an easy task.
Unfortunately, they are the older D-type hydraulic twin tube type that
need to be fully compressed to adjust them.
Anyway, just my humble two cents worth. Whatever you choose, it will
probable be better than the stock "Caddilac" ride. And the springs
lower the car 1.5" in front and 1" in rear for a much more agressive
stance and better roll control/response.
Happy motoring!!!
Brian Vinson
Ferndale, Mi
86 5KCSTQ "getting closer to what I want.."