Re: Too good to be true..

[drobbins@net2net.com (David Robbins)]

At 10:50 AM 11/8/96 -0500, Dan Masi wrote:


>But I've gotta disagree here.  Low beam *pattern* is perfect,
>IMO.  But low beam *intensity* is pitiful.  High beams could
>stand a bit more power, too.  IMHO.  So I'd be interested in
>hearing about A4 lighting solutions.

Well put.  Although I don't have a problem with the high beams from a
strength standpoint, they just don't seems as focused.

>BTW, what about the fog lights on the A4?  Is that yet another
>element built into the same bulb, or is it a separate bulb?

I'm pretty sure this is a seperate bulb...

-DMR.