RE: A6QuattroWagon

[Peter Henriksen <peterhe@microsoft.com>]

The performance is nowhere near comparable. The V6 is a nice engine, but
it has *way* too much to lug around in the A6 quattro (and probably even
more so in the wagon).

Personally, I think the A6 looks somewhat better than the 200, but
that's a personal preference and you're in as good a position to judge
that as I am :-).

In my experience, the A6 somehow looks smaller than the 100/200, but is
a little bigger on the inside. If you mean to ask about room in the rear
seat (not the 3rd seat - I don't like those at all. There's very little
protection from a rear impact.), I think you'll be more than happy with
that.
- peter
  peterhe@microsoft.com - http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/1001
  91 200qw
  94 acura legend gs
  issaquah, wa, usa


>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Strtsmart@aol.com [SMTP:Strtsmart@aol.com]
>Sent:	Thursday, January 02, 1997 7:59 AM
>To:	quattro@coimbra.ans.net
>Subject:	A6QuattroWagon
>
>We're considering trading in our '91 200 Quattro Wagon (Pearl) for a '97 A6
>Quattro Wagon.  Any thoughts (especially in re: general performance, and
>whether the rear seats are ok for children)? 
>
>