Torque Wrench Extension

[quk@sievers.com (Phil Payne)]

In message <"<0E0C133381925471>0E0C133381925471@wc1.bbc"@-SMF-> henegp20%training1.wn.bbc@nr-comms.radio.bbc.co.uk (Paul Heneghan) writes:

> >The principle's right, but the maths is wrong.
>
> >332 ft lbs at the nut.
>
> We are obviously using different maths!  Here is my working (with my
> assumptions).

[snippage]


Don't argue with me - argue with Audi.  This is their figure for what the
torque should be without the 2079.  In the "RR" documentation it clearly says
"350Nm with 2079, 450Nm if 2079 not available".

450Nm translates roughly to 332 lb ft.

--
 Phil Payne
 phil@sievers.com
 Committee Member, UK Audi [ur-]quattro Owners Club