[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1.8 turbo Passat tuned by ABT
> From: Kwattro@aol.com
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 22:31:11 -0400 (EDT)
> To: scottst@microsoft.com
> Cc: quattro@coimbra.ans.net
> Subject: Re: 1.8 turbo Passat tuned by ABT
> In a message dated 97-04-30 18:43:25 EDT, you write:
>
> << s I sit here waiting for my 1.8tqm, I have a question regarding what I
> think are [relatively] slow 0-60 times for tweaked 1.8ts.
>
> I remember reading about the ABT A41.8t in European Car, supposedly
> with 250hp, and scratching my head at the 6.5s 0-60 (or was it 100kph?)
> I would think that this car should be quite a bit quicker than this with
> 250hp. I've also heard data on mid-7s 0-60 with the ~190hp "chip
> upgrade".
> For instance, the US-spec M3 w/240hp is turning 0-60
> in ~5.9s. My Corrado SLC came very close to the 6.5s mark with
> 178hp & FWD...
>
> Any thoughts? Is this due to the lack of low-end torque? Does the
> powerplant become "peaky" when boosted to this level? Is the
> 1.8t heavier than an M3?
>
> Thanks,
> Scott Stiles
> scottst@microsoft.com >>
>
>
> Well, you've got a couple of things here. First off, the M3 is lighter than
> the A4. Second, you're SLC must have been modified, because even highly
> modified vw's have problems hitting 60 in 6.5 due to lack of traction. Stock
> is just over 7 seconds for the GTI VR6, which only has 6 hp less and is
> roughly the same weight. The Abt car, as we discussed prior to this
> conversation, was geared for midrange responce and high speed, as the 175 mph
> top speed testifies (the car only had a 5 speed, stock unit with a different
> final drive.) The A4 just has a lot of weight to overcome, and the
> incredible grip off the line bogs the engine down to some extent. It's
> similar to the 4000 vs the coupe. The 4000 has more power and grip, but the
> coupe is faster. Why? Although the 4000 may make up ground after, say 30
> mph, the initial burst from the coupe up to 25 can not be overcome to 60 mph.
> Carter Johnson
> Kwattro@aol.com
> 86 4000CS quattro
> 86 Coupe GT (FS)
> 86 GTI
I wasn't aware that the 4000 was more powerful than the coupeGT. I
thought they were powered by identical engines. Mine is the 2.3
liter which I was told the 4000 had at the end of its poduction run.
Jon
___
jwilliam@water.net
87 Coupe GT