Re: CQ Worth it? (vsother Qs?)

[Mark.Granoff@Software.com (Mark Granoff)]

At 11:50 AM 8/6/97 -0700, Derek Daily wrote:
>I'm a little concerned about performance and reliability of the
>CQ's...(only because they seem to be discussed here less
>frequently....a good sign?)..can some of you set me straight.

I've only had my '94 90CSQ for about a month now, so I can't comment too
much on reliability and so forth. But I can say "so far so good." :-)

I had similar questions as you have and I asked here if I should
(essentially) stay clear from the 90 or not.

The concensus from the crowd was to go for it and that there should be
little to worry about.

That said, I don't know anything about the mechanical, reliability, or
performance improvements between a '91 90 and a '94 90. So, buyer beware.
Surely others here can comment though.

>1)  Typical worn parts?
>2)  Things to look out for?
>3)  Upgrade-ability (what would the chip do to the NA 2.3l?)
>4)  Anyone replace that Climate control face?

Dunno, on all counts.

>5)  Original Sticker $$?

I know that my 90CSQ stickered in the high $20's back in '94.

>6)  What do you love about the CQ?

Climate control :-) and Quattro. Never did I think I would ever say "I
can't wait for winter."

-Mark
--
Mark H. Granoff                                 Mark.Granoff@Software.com
      Software.com, Inc. - The Internet Infrastructure Company (tm)
                 91 Hartwell Avenue, Lexington, MA 02173
 Phone: +1.617.274.7000 x226, FAX: +1.617.674.1080, W3: www.software.com
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed herein are not necessarily Software.com's.