Re: 5ktq Mods - Math vs Claims - long

["Randall C. Markarian" <asenna@accessus.net>]

QSHIPQ@aol.com wrote:
Much paraphased/plagarized text snipped.

>  
>
> Does it work?  I suppose, haven't driven the car.  Can it work?  I
> guess so,
> I've been in plenty of turbo cars with owners that don't care what
> happens
> below 4000rpm, or just don't care what happens, period.  Does it mean
> it's
> "better," fast and faster?  "Than what?" would be my question. 
> Randall
> proposed, "better and faster than before."  Ok, but numbers were
> given.  And
> claimed.  A 134ci motor and 2.8PR is needlessly high, by physics and
> math,
> and a real indication something ain't totally right here.  Effective
> CR
> (BMEP) is sky high too, alas, another discussion. So Scott,
> Chipindippindude
> away sir, sonic booms sometimes can be mistaken for head gaskets. 
> "Motors by
> the dozen at 300USD" might get scarce quickly.

Typical Scott Justusson crap!  If it does not come from his lips, it
must be untrue.  I have known Eric since his car was by your own
admission somewhat faster than yours.  I have seen the mods.  Have you
seen the turbo?  Do you know what turbo it is?  Have you seen the IC? 
Then how do you know what it is?  Just because you can post up numbers
ion equations that I know that I have recently seen does not make what
you say correct.  THe formulas are, but your assumptions are way off and
you have assumed everthing(since you know nothing of the actual mods). 
But here you go shooting your mouth off on the list.  Are you a vendor
Scott?  Do you sell products such as turbos or do you share freely with
specific info or just vague sales pitch?  I could tell you who will sell
the chip, but that is not my place.  I guarantee that Eric will not sell
said parts unless it is to go on my car and then it won't be for
profit.  So...what is your motive?

>  
>
> Simplistically stated, I need more salt for my margarita, been
> ingesting big
> grains recently.  Specific formulas and variations available to anyone
> via a
> variety of sources.  Only "claims", extrapolated for calculations. 
> More of
> them could indicate more specifically where improvements could be
> made.
> Claims facinating.  As always, initial consultations are at no charge.
>
> Good to see CIS control and lower chamber pressures finally are being
> addressed.  1325 EGT?  Whatever is happening at that 2.79PR, fuel
> doesn't
> seem to be a problem.
>
> Hmmmmm...  Cough.  I know I saw that S2 badge somewhere...

Oh by the way, do you have a 20v motor and a K29 turbo on you car? 
Better call Ned and tell himm he's doing it all wrong.   Boy the list
was awfully quiet there for a while.  What happenned to the Audicar.com
gig?:-)

--

Randall C. Markarian

1990 V8 Quattro
1996 Merc E320
1987 5000 TQ B.S. (bone stock)

Saint Louis, Missouri