Re: Correcting for 80% VE - just more questions then

[QSHIPQ@aol.com]

In a message dated 97-10-30 12:05:25 EST, you write:

<< Depends on how you define 'control'.  If you mean closed loop, you can't.
 However, it could be done as follows:
 
 Set AtoD output of PT at 2.50bar less than 0xFF.  Set desired boost
 to 0xFF.  Set WGFV tables to give a WGFV duty cycle in this situation
 to that (experimentally determined) which gives the desired PR.
 ...or maybe 2.79 is what the duty cycle in Eric's computer happens
 to give when the PT maxes out.
 
 I wouldn't think this would be too accurate given changing air temps,
 but probably similar to using a pressure regulator instead of the
 WGFV.
  >>
I don't understand Orin.  A fixed value for WGFV after 2.50 is not
controlling the wg any more, by definition, then it becomes BL spring
pressure issue.  What is the difference between 2.51 and 2.79 above?

BTW, given the PR and flows vs the claims, not sure we need to spend a lot of
time here.

Scott