Re: Accepting your "exceptions" - conclusion?

[Lawrence Mann <lpmann@mannlaw.com>]

You have a bad address

mannlaw.com is my domain

lpmann@mannlaw.com

At 05:29 PM 11/1/97 -0600, Matt & Jenai wrote: 
>>>>
> Bruce, On 11/1 you write: 
> >>>>>  A lot of us here  are saying NO ONE, based on the claim vs math<<<<<  "Ah, correction:  You are saying it a  lot of times, which 
> makes it sound like a lot of people are are saying  it--whatever it may be."   Ah, double correction.  I will give you the  benefit of the doubt and assume that you may only be reading posts from QSHIPQ  or Eric or Randall.  However, it seems to me that QSHIPQ has been supported  by plenty of folks.  Off the top of my head (sorry for butchering some of  these names)-  Dave Lawson, AudiQtroCp, Frederic Breitwieser, Chippindippindude (?), Audidudi, and myself.  Judging from your e-mail address, I assume that  either you are an attorney or work in a law firm. If so, then you probably know  the difference between objective  evidence(Scott & Dave's posts) vs. subjective evidence (your arse.  Oh  yeah, Randall's too).  Since Eric has been unable or unwilling to answer  the tough questions posed by Dave and Scott, his claims and your buttocks carry  little weight.  [Insert joke here :-)]    Matthew Pfeffer 89 200TQW