Re: Fizzicks in Audis

[Tom Leveckis <leveckis@ici.net>]

It gets tiring to hear all you quattroholics keep bad mouthing
Mustangs......lest we remeber:

 - the original MSRP of a Mustang GT was half of a Quattro....

 - the 302 is a 28 year old design.......

 - gimme a week and 1/2 the $$ you spend on your Q's, and I
would make a Mustang dust your Q's off the line and down the strech

Oh yeah....the same hold true for a Z28 and a Trans Am as well....

Tom Leveckis

Olesen, Allan wrote:

> On Sat, 7 Feb 1998 19:22:20 -0700 (MST), you wrote:
>
> >Ah, BTDT, too... lots of Stangs around. Actually, I think a stock 302
> w/AT
> >would be lunch for a 5ktq. Certainly my 87 5kt (Flowmaster and cold
> air
> >intake, determined pilot) eats those regularly around here.
> >The 5ktq was said to dash 0-60 in 7.7 by the factory brochure. I
> recall
> >5-speed Mustangs doing it in the low 7s. AT- 8 or so? The Audi also
> has
> >what, 3.89 or 4.11 gears? I believe that a lightly tweaked MC is more
> than
> >a match for a 302...
>
> I saw an american movie a few weeks ago. The hero drove a Mustang.
> Some of the shots were taken inside the car. It seemed that max.
> odometer reading was 100 MPH????
>
> --
> Allan Olesen, Denmark
>
> 83 100cd man. 243k miles (just runs and runs and...)
> 87 100cd aut. 144k miles (wish it did too)
> 84 Toyota Corolla        (no comments, hiding face behind newspaper)
> 66 Jaguar S              (rusting/awaiting restoration)
> 65 Jaguar S              (rusting/awaiting restoration)