[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: urq brake UPGRADE! was Re: '82 urq: Uneven Brake Pad Wear (right to left)
Thanks for your input, Mike! I'm running these 3 combinations: 205/50/15
on 15x8 Ronals, 205/55/16 on 16x7 Speedlines (A8 wheels), and 225/45/16 on
16x8 BBS's. The tests were run with the 205/50/15's installed. The crappy
Yoko 403's were on the back so that the car would oversteer a bit on the
track (on purpose), but I felt similar lock with the good SP8000s on
(215/55/16), too.
BTW, another data point: I'm running Porterfield R4 carbon kevlar pads up
front and Ferrodo carbon metallic pads on the rear. The rear has slotted,
non-vented rotors; the front OE ventilated rotors (new). Braided steel
lines all around with Girling DOT 5.1 (non-silicon) brake fluid (new).
At 01:20 PM 3/11/98 PST, you wrote:
>The brake upgrade is a great success! Those Girling 60 dual piston
>>calipers I installed last year really did need an upgraded master
>cylinder,too
>
>Good 4 you!
>>
>>I did not take Mike's advice to run without a rear proportioning valve;
>I was too chicken to do so after brake horror stories from other list
>members.
>
>Sure, make me paranoid!
>
>In the wet, however, the rears had a tendency to lock up easily. Full
>line pressure at the rear wheels is dangerous, IMHO, on any moist/wet
>road.
>
>I found the opposite, in the moist, my fronts lock up with the bigger
>brakes, which is why I was looking to bias up the rear! What tire size
>are you using?
>
>>The '91 200q master cylinder was a direct bolt on.
>
>Excellent to know.
Do NOT use this master cylinder if you're buying one new. Use the '90 200q
one intead! Same specs; though 4 brakeline connections vs. 2!
>Mike
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>