Re: Fields of dreaming

[QSHIPQ <QSHIPQ@aol.com>]

In a message dated 98-04-06 10:06:55 EDT, you write:

<< Let's get a handle on what is important here (nothing). But regardless, M3-
sports
 >sedan (4) sports coupe (2). Urq- sports coupe. Got a back seat? You got a
coupe.
 >This how I see it. Repeat, this is how I see it. It does not matter which
BMW is
 >quicker or more responsive, the bigger and heavier 5ktq's will run rings
around my
> 90q. So what? Does that mean that my sports sedan is really an economy car?
I >do
> not think so.
 
>harrison
 
> btw- please do not think that I am under the impression that my word is law
  >>
Harrison, the apples to apples world in which we live counts for more than
you, or apparently, audi too, seems to give credit.  Your 90q doesn't compete
with a 5ktq, my point exactly.  However, competing against a 325IX, it didn't
fair so well either, that is the orchard.  My point.

What is important is competition, apples are apples.  Subjectively and
objectively they are all rated in that world.  WE like audis, my resume is no
exception.  Objectively, I believe that to be a compromise.  Subjectively I
believe it to be so as well.  Still got my 3.  Not for a minute do I ignore
good apples in the orchards in which we drive.  

Scott
'87 5ktqw
'86 5ktqw
'84 Urq