[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
RE: 325ix...
Two more data points on this:
1) In 1991, I had the opportunity to drive a 1988 325ix for three days. I
found it handled very much like the typical RWD BMW -- tail happy, in other
words -- and rather sluggish, presumably due to its weight. I did NOT find
the brakes particularly effective, either. Overall, I wasn't as favorably
impressed with it as I hoped I would be and didn't buy it, deciding instead
to wait until used M3s became cheaper. (Yes, I *will* buy one of them
someday ... they're not as quick as the most recent M3s but, IMHO, they're
*much* more fun to drive!)
2) The March 1988 issue of Performance Car did a six-car comparison of AWD
vehicles, the 325ix and Ur-Q waving the flags for BMW and Audi,
respectively. They noted that the 325ix had significant amounts of
understeer and they had to change their driving style to accomodate; they
also noted that it required more effort on the part of the driver than any
of the other cars they tested to match the pace set by the Ur-Q. Lastly,
they likewise claimed the brakes sucked.
________________________________________________________________________
_ _
/ | _| o | \ _| o Jeffrey Goggin
/__| | | / | | __ | | | | / | | audidudi@mindspring.com
/ | |_| \_| | |_/ |_| \_| | http://www.mindspring.com/~audidudi/
________________________________________________________________________