Quattro -v- other 4x4 systems

["Andrew Jackson (CCC-REO)" <Andrew.Jackson@Digital.com>]

Given the welcome return of the Torsen debate (I find _everbody's_ comments
very interesting), I thought I'd raise a related question:

Can anybody (pro- or anti-torsen) comment, from personal experience, on how
it compares to other *PERFORMANCE* 4x4 systems in terms of driver
ENJOYMENT/FUN?

I only ask because, having recently "upgraded" from a Ford Sierra (aka
Merkur) 4x4 with fixed 60r/40f split to a 90q20v, I feel very disapointed.
The Sierra was great fun. It exhibited the all benefits of each different
type of power delivery: it had the reassuring front-end "pull" of front
wheel drive; the controllable oversteering fun of a rear wheel drive; and
the great traction of a 4x4.

The 90q on the other hand seems to have none of these benefits. And, to make
things worse, its not even predictable because its characteristcs can change
mid corner.  Quattro may be fine to help a family car in poor road
conditions, but I do not believe it to be a *PERFORMACE* 4x4 system. It
greatly detracts from driver pleasure and, as such, means that the car is
not at "driver's car".

My very positive experience of 4x4 on the Ford convinced me that I'd NEVER
go back to 2 wheel drive.  When I blew the engine on the Ford, I decided to
upgrade to a 90Q. But I've been so disapointed with the 90Q that I'm getting
a new engine fitted in the Ford so that I can sell the Audi.

Andrew Jackson ______________________________________
Mail & Messaging Team, Command and Control Centre, REO. Digital UK
(7)830-6973   +44(0)118-920-6973      <andrew.jackson@digital.com>