Re: H&R vs. Eibach

["Martin Pajak" <quattro@rogerswave.ca>]

> Date:          Wed, 20 May 1998 11:23:08 -0400
> From:          "Eric Renneisen" <renneie@hlthsrc.com>
> To:            quattro@rogerswave.ca, quattro@coimbra.ans.net
> Subject:       Re: H&R vs. Eibach

> >BTW do progressive springs supposed to have a few coils closer 
> >together (usually towards the top of the spring)?  My do not and I 
> >noticed another set of Pro's did (Ur-q's). Clarification of this 
> >would be apriciated.
> 
> I believe you are correct about the coil spacing. When I checked 
> with Eibach about the specifics of their ProKit for the 90Q/CQ, 
> they said that the fronts were LINEAR, and only the rears were 
> progressive. Hmmm... creative marketing?

The funny thing both the front and rear springs have equal coil 
spacing.  False advertising?

Cheers.

Martin Pajak
quattro@rogerswave.ca
http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/5939

1982 Coupe TURBO (473,150 km)
1984 4000s quattro 
1986 4000s quattro (334,000 km) soon to be 5 bolt pattern
1982 Coupe (154,000) parts car

CEO of exam lastminute allniter rollthedice inc.