[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: OPINION WANTED : Audi as a "consumer" vehicle (long)

To: Michael Williams <daserde@ucla.edu>, quattro group <quattro@coimbra.ans.net>
Subject: Re: OPINION WANTED : Audi as a "consumer" vehicle (long)
From: Huw Powell <human@nh.ultranet.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 22:33:34 -0400
References: <199807282224.PAA31376@theta2.ben2.ucla.edu>
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net

Michael Williams wrote:
> 
> Pcarselle decided to speak these words:
> 
> >1.- Do not buy Quattro
> 
> I dont understand this one.  I have never heard of the quattro system
> costing anything as far as maintainance...am i wrong?  i just dont
> consider it ia maintainance item...i dunno

Two front ends, five vs two driveshafts costs more to maintain.  Apart
from that, yeah, when was the last time someone's torsen actually
*broke*?

-- 
Huw Powell

http://www.thebook.com/human-speakers/audi-main.htm

Follow-Ups:
- Re: OPINION WANTED : Audi as a "consumer" vehicle (long)
  - From: "Douglas Hurst Quebbeman" <dougq@iglou.com>

References:
- Re: OPINION WANTED : Audi as a "consumer" vehicle (long)
  - From: Michael Williams <daserde@ucla.edu>

Prev by Author: in search of... badges
Next by Author: Re: OPINION WANTED : Audi as a "consumer" vehicle (long)
Prev by thread: valve problem on 5000s
Next by thread: Re: OPINION WANTED : Audi as a "consumer" vehicle (long)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread