[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: 944turbo v. ur-q



I've got 3 words for you:
944 Turbo S

Contact JT Engineering, Powerhaus, Powerhaus II, or Windward Performance and
you can easily (depending how much you would like to spend) get between 300
to 400 bhp.

As mentioned the balance is tremendous. The 944 was de-tuned from the
factory so as not to out perform its older and more expensive brethren
(911). Much along the lines of 1.8 Vs. 2.8 A4 there is allot of performance
potential hidden in there.

If you already have your mandatory Audi why not go for the P car?

Frank--
-----Original Message-----
From: Brett Dikeman <brett@pdikeman.ne.mediaone.net>
To: David Coleman <dcoleman@blackrock.com>
Cc: quattro@coimbra.ans.net <quattro@coimbra.ans.net>
Date: Friday, July 31, 1998 5:49 PM
Subject: Re: 944turbo v. ur-q
>
>The 944 turbo is a very nice car; however, if you want some Ur-Q and
>mustang-5.0 butt-kickin' power, try to find a Calloway 944.  300+hp.  Very
>rare(under 50, if I recall, had the conversion done.)  We have one sitting
>in our garage, albiet in many, many pieces.  We're trying to convince my
>father to get rid of it; either put it all back together or just sell as-is
>and let the new owner throw it back together.  It would make an excellent
>track car.