[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: 91 200TQ Driving Impressions - What am I missing?

To: Mark.POLLAN@mci.com (Mark Pollan)
Subject: Re: 91 200TQ Driving Impressions - What am I missing?
From: Andrew Duane USG/PE <duane@zk3.dec.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 15:57:35 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: quattro@coimbra.ans.net (Quattro List)
In-Reply-To: <19980915193055.MWJU18768@localHost> from "Mark Pollan" at Sep 15, 98 03:30:00 pm
Reply-To: duane@zk3.dec.com
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net

Hairy green toads from Mars made Mark Pollan say:

> Drove an 5spd 200TQ today with 63K on the clock.  It is not what I
> expected:(
> 
> The car pulled strongly to 1.7bar on the display but didn't seem at
> all nimble.  I have an '86 5KCSTQ which feels much tighter/responsive
> than the 200TQ.  What gives?  Is the suspension in need of TLC?  No
> rattles, clunks, etc.

63K means it probably has the original shocks, which are
probably hammered....

-- 

Andrew L. Duane (JOT-7)			duane@zk3.dec.com
Compaq Computer Corporation		(603)-884-1294
110 Spit Brook Road
M/S ZKO3-3/U14
Nashua, NH    03062-2698

Only my cat shares my opinions, and she's too psychotic to express it

References:
- 91 200TQ Driving Impressions - What am I missing?
  - From: Mark Pollan <Mark.POLLAN@mci.com>

Prev by Author: Re: center bearing
Next by Author: Re: Fwd: Audi A8 Achieves Highest Possible Safety Test Rating
Prev by thread: 91 200TQ Driving Impressions - What am I missing?
Next by thread: Re: 91 200TQ Driving Impressions - What am I missing?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread