Re: brakes and lonnnng downhills (longish)

["Gary G. Erickson" <erickson@teleport.com>]

Chris Newbold wrote:

> > But, what about the fact that the rear brakes are smaller (pads and
> > rotors) and possibly not vented (I don't remember which car we're
> > talking about now!)?
>
> That's exactly the conclusion I came to and outlined in my last
> paragraph. I don't know the details of the rear brakes on Phil's 200,
> but rear brakes are typically "smaller" than fronts...

Yup, you said that.  

That's what I get for replying to messages before I've finished reading
them.

So what's the punishment?  50 laps around the block in my brother beat
up '72 dorF van?  ;-)

later,

-Gary