[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ignorant question on 80 vs. 90 models

To: quinn@hns.com
Subject: Re: Ignorant question on 80 vs. 90 models
From: Andrew Duane USG <duane@hunch.zk3.dec.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 13:11:43 -0500 (EST)
Cc: quattro@coimbra.ans.net (Quattro List)
In-Reply-To: <852566B2.005BB932.00@ngw2.hns.com> from "quinn@hns.com" at Nov 4, 98 11:49:00 am
Reply-To: duane@zk3.dec.com
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net

> The 80 and 90 had the same body style, but the 80 (non-q) had
> the 4-cyl engine (1800cc I think).  The 80quattro and the 90,
> 90quattro all had the 5-cyl.  Other than that, Andrew is correct.

I wasn't sure about the 4 cylinder non-Q. I know it applies to
the 4000's, but didn't want to guess wrong on the 80.

-- 

Andrew L. Duane (JOT-7)			duane@zk3.dec.com
Compaq Computer Corporation		(603)-884-1294
110 Spit Brook Road
M/S ZKO3-3/U14
Nashua, NH    03062-2698

Only my cat shares my opinions, and she's too psychotic to express it

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ignorant question on 80 vs. 90 models
  - From: Richard Beels <beels@technologist.com>

References:
- Re: Ignorant question on 80 vs. 90 models
  - From: quinn@hns.com

Prev by Author: Re: Ignorant question on 80 vs. 90 models
Next by Author: Re: <off Topic> Merc. AMG
Prev by thread: Re: Ignorant question on 80 vs. 90 models
Next by thread: Re: Ignorant question on 80 vs. 90 models
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread