Re: Dialynx headers...

[quk@isham-research.demon.co.uk (Phil Payne)]

In message <92858bea.368b9aa5@aol.com> Sonar465@aol.com writes:

> A few weeks ago when I was in scotland I picked up a magazine called "Audi
> Drive" (not sure if that is the name)  There was a ad for dialynx and they
> said ,in the ad, that they had re worked there header to exacting standards.
> I take it that they have not really changed these things?

"Audi Driver".

Yes.  It has been suggested that a large proportion of Dialynx's
customers are perfectly satisfied.  However ...

Everyone I know who has fitted a Dialynx manifold (and this includes
me - BTDT) has had the thing warp.  If Aelred or anyone else at Dialynx
questions this, refer them to their invoice 962728 from May this year.

However - one thing we (the disappointed users) all have in common is
that we drive our cars.  The _vast_ majority of ur-quattros in the UK
are not used daily - they're on insurance policies that permit a
maximum of 5000 miles a year, and sometimes only half that.  I'm doing
20,000 a year.

Another thing we have in common is that we all have MB engines.  I'm
not aware of a dissatisfied Dialynx user with a WR engine, but then I'm
also not aware of any WR owners who use them as daily drivers.  I'm not
aware of any MBs that are _not_ used as daily drivers.

--
 Phil Payne
 Phone: 0385 302803   Fax: 01536 723021
 (The contents of this post will _NOT_ appear in the UK Newsletter.)