[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
S4 Ohne Kats
Hello all,
I finally got around to doing the after testing on the cat bypasses (raw
data as well as my impressions follow). Once again this is on a '93 S4 (Ur)
w/ 65,000 miles, Hoppen Stage III (RS2 manifold, RS2 turbo, Lehman eproms)
pumping 30 psig max boost. The exhaust is stock save for the recently
installed Stebro cat bypasses, ahem, I mean "Euro resonators."
Testing was done using four extremely accurate instruments: gtechpro, VDO
pressure gauge, radio shack sound level meter, and my butt. As well as a
pair of more questionable instruments: my eyeballs. It is rather difficult
to keep one eye on the road, one eye on the boost gauge and yet a third on
the back pressure gauge, unless you bring a friend.
This table probably won't email well. Tough.
Before (stock)
Backpressure @ 16 psig of boost: 3.25 psig
Backpressure @ 30 psig of boost: 6.10 psig (avg., see needle comment)
Max boost 1st Sub 20 psig
Max boost 2nd Sub 22 psig
Max boost 3rd Sub 25 psig
Bhp, gtechpro @ the wheels: 292 bhp
Instantaneous forward G's: 0.70g
Loudness (idle): 64 dBs
Weight of Kats: 25 lbs, 14.5 ozs
After (bypassed)
Backpressure @ 16 psig of boost: N/A
Backpressure @ 30 psig of boost: 3.25 to 4.00 (needle bounces violently)
Max boost 1st 20+ psig
Max boost 2nd 22+ psig
Max boost 3rd 30 psig
Bhp, gtechpro @ the wheels: 295 bhp
Instantaneous forward G's: 0.68 g
Loudness (idle): 67 dBs
Weight of bypasses: 14 lbs 6.5 ozs
The back pressure really didn't start to build until the higher boost levels
and at 30 psig of boost the back pressure gauge read between 3.25 psi and
4.00 psi (needle bounces rather violently, more so in the after test). This
represents between 2.1 psi and 2.75 psi less back pressure than the stock
system. However, I feel that the most important aspect is the lack of any
measurable back pressure under 20 to 25 psig of boost. From a seat of the
pants standpoint it is blatantly obvious that lag has been reduced. Higher
boost levels are attainable in the lower gears as the turbo has more time to
build boost prior to the 7,000 RPM redline.
The bhp and instataneous G figures are attributable to several factors that
affect the read out of the gtechpro. Ambient conditions as well as on boost
vs off boost transition. In fact, the gtechpro literature warns of reduced
accuracy on turbocharged vehicles given the way it measures power vs the way
a turbo delivers power. While peak power levels are probably up a bit with
the bypasses installed the power delivery has changed. What I am getting at
is that there are too many variables at play to discern any real info from
the before and after Bhp and G figures. Graphs on the other hand would tell
a more accurate story. G's over RPMs would show the bypassed version with a
steeper graph earlier on.
As far as sound and noise go the exhaust is not that much louder than stock.
from a quantitative standpoint probably 3 dBs, from a qualitative standpoint
not much different from stock. To be honest, I was hoping for a more manly
rumble. I can, however, extrapolate from this that the stock center
resonator and rear muffler baffle the hell out of the exhaust (yet still
flow well for a stock system). Apparantly team door handle didn't work on
the S4 exhaust?
Normal disclaimers apply (any similarities between this and reality is
purely coincidental), I am just seeking the facts and I thought I would
share them with you. Bottom line is that bypasses add to the fun factor of
my particular setup.
YM, however, MV,
Frank--