Re: New $4

["Andrew Seward" <reming@idir.net>]

Virtual Bob wrote:

>The difference is that their M3 is not the same as our M3. U.S. M3 carries
>engine from 328i, with extra boring to make it 3.0 liter (or 3.2,
>whatever). Their M3 has geniune racing-derived, hand-made I6. If I recall,
>that expensive I6 cannot stand U.S.' high-sulfur content gasoline or
>something, leading BMW to make a "special" M3 just for the U.S. market (no
>magical 100bhp/liter, etc.).


The primary difference between the Euro-spec BMW M3 and the U.S. spec M3
lies in the more sophisticated cylinder head, intake and accompanying engine
management, which allows the the Euro version to make approximately 80 extra
horsepower over the U.S. version. I believe there are also some differences
in suspension (spring rates/shock valving) and transmission choices.

The E36 model 1995 M3 was a 3.0 liter.  This was bumped up to 3.2 liter
displacement in either late 1996 or early 1997.

I believe most of the complaints about "high sulfur gasoline" problems came
from owners of the early (1989 - on) 5-series cars, not from the 3-series
cars.

>Personally, I'd be happy if S4 ever comes here. And I wouldn't want to pay
>$45,000 for a souped-up 328i -- aka "M3." That's WAAAAAY over-priced.

You're correct - in my mind, a used 1995 - 1998 M3 is a better buy any day
than a new 328i for that kind of money.

By the way, the E-36 M3 was not originally scheduled to reach our U.S.
shores; it was planned as a Euro-only model.  BMW responded to a massive
U.S. customer write-in campaign (led by the BMW Car Club of America) that
expressed customer desire to have an M3 here in America.  By building the
U.S.-spec M3 with a less expensive motor, etc., BMW was able to import an M3
that was cheaper while satisfying U.S. customer demand.  Great idea.
They've certainly sold a lot of them and it's been great for their company
image.

VR,
Andy Seward