Re: low-flo filters

[Sachelle Babbar <sbabbar@iris.nyit.edu>]

I'm sorry, that came out wrong because I was in a rush. The K&N didn't do
so well compared to the paper. Dirty paper filtered better than clean,
btw.

****************************************************************************
*Steve                                             Sachelle Babbar
*'87  5000CS Turbo 5spd 1.3-2.0 bar             <SBABBAR@IRIS.NYIT.EDU>
*Cockpit adjustable wastegate, AudiSport badge
*
*Disclaimer:"Any information contained herein is based purely on my own
*personal experience and may not necessarily reflect yours. Use caution as
*your results may vary from mine."
********************************************************************************
                                                                               



On Sat, 20 Feb 1999, Phil Payne wrote:

> In message <Pine.SOL.3.96.990220160045.2471A-100000@iris.nyit.edu> Sachelle Babbar writes:
> 
> > I read a report a year or so back and it compared the filtering of a paper
> > element to the K&N (and types) and it saw more wear in the upper cylinders
> > and more debris in the upper intake than with paper only.
> 
> Everyone I know who's wiped a clean swab around the airbox inboard of
> a chickenwire filter has gone back to paper.
> 
> --
>  Phil Payne
>  Phone: 0385 302803   Fax: 01536 723021
>  (The contents of this post will _NOT_ appear in the UK Newsletter.)
>