[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why FWD?

To: "'quattro@coimbra.ans.net'" <quattro@coimbra.ans.net>
Subject: Re: Why FWD?
From: Scott Sierakowski <scott@collectorspub.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 08:22:58 -0500
Organization: CPC Inc.
References: <790ACAAC0F0AD211AAD50080D870109C02802C21@eamrcnt714.exu.ericsson.se>
Reply-To: scott@collectorspub.com
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net

I respect you for having the balls for that post.

Why knock the FWD did this not come first, it was a quattro that was developed
from the FWD.  All Audi cars share everything from parts to history and you
want to exclude them because the drivetrain is different on their car.  Yes, it
is the quattro list which refers to audi cars, which includes FWD last time I
checked.   I thought Racism would never rear it's ugly head on the q-list!!!

Scott
95 90 quattro sport

I use to have a 85 5K FWD

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why FWD?
  - From: Mohamed El-Rouby <melrouby@worldnet.att.net>

References:
- Why FWD? + MIME question
  - From: "P-O Selander (EUS)" <EUSPOS@am1.ericsson.se>

Prev by Date: Re: Turbo oil lines
Next by Date: RE: redneck audi
Prev by thread: Why FWD? + MIME question
Next by thread: Re: Why FWD?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread