Re: 5000 vs 200 TQ Avant

["John Corbishley" <gtr1@traverse.com>]

Thanks Robert.  Any particular preferences/pros & cons in the model years?

John Corbs
Traverse City, MI
'83 & '85 Ur-qs (for my sins)
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Myers <rmyers@inetone.net>
To: John Corbishley <JCorbs@gtresort.com>
Date: Friday, March 05, 1999 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: 5000 vs 200 TQ Avant


>I have had two '89 200s.  I chipped them both.  YeeHaw!!!  Almost as good
>as my present S6.
>
>At 09:28 AM 3/5/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>I originally set my sights on the '91 200 TQW, but recent posts seem to
>>indicate that the later 5000's and early 200s, i.e. non 20v, are also a
>>really good option.
>>
>>I'd appreciate your opinions/experience.
>>
>>TIA
>>
>>John Corbs
>>Traverse City, MI
>>'83 & '85 Ur-qs (for my sins)
>>
>>
>>
>___
>   Bob
>  *******************************************************************
>  *  Robert L. Myers  rmyers@inetone.net    Home 304-574-2372/1166  *
>  *  Rt. 4, Box 57,  Fayetteville, WV 25840 USA      WV tag Q SHIP  *
>  *  '95 S6  Cashmere Grey - der Wunderwagen         ICQ 22170244   *
>  *  http://www.cob-net.org/church/pvcob.htm                        *
>  *******************************************************************
>