Todd Phenneger wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Bob wrote: > > Uhh, I cant find a RE 91'. There is a 92' and a 910 but no 91'. > I know the 92's are pretty good. Is the 910 a replacement for the > 92's???. > THanks Ill bet you're right... I think they are 92's... Fellow lister Chris Locke might know, he's done just about as many miles in my car as I have :) Bob