[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: re Re: Headlight Hype? or Facts

To: kirby.a.smith@lmco.com
Subject: Re: re Re: Headlight Hype? or Facts
From: Robert Houk - WorkGroup Server Firmware <Robert.Houk@East.Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 15:27:18 -0500
CC: quattro@coimbra.ans.net
In-reply-to: <A955A4BCA8F8D011AE1C0000F804A88A02B1D149@emss05m02.sanders.lmco.com>(kirby.a.smith@lmco.com)
Reply-to: Robert.Houk@East.Sun.COM
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net

   The diff between a 80/100 and 55/60 bulb is only just discernable.  I think
   ...
--- and ---

   Huw is right.  The eye is logarithmic in response.  Further, there are
   ...

Isnt' the eye progressively more sensitive at low light levels than at
high light levels? I.e., at low-light-levels ("night"), doubling the
light energy is substantially more perceivable than at high-light-levels
("day")?

					-RDH

References:
- re Re: Headlight Hype? or Facts
  - From: "Smith, Kirby A" <kirby.a.smith@lmco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: UFO brakes
Next by Date: Re: fuse box upgrade
Prev by thread: re Re: Headlight Hype? or Facts
Next by thread: RE: re Re: Headlight Hype? or Facts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread