Re: H&R vs Eibach, which for 4kq?

["Pat Martin" <mardkins@email.msn.com>]

That was from the sag level.  ~120k miles worth.

Pat
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark L. Chang <mchang@ece.nwu.edu>
To: Pat Martin <mardkins@email.msn.com>
Cc: Wolff <quattro200@earthlink.net>; quattro@coimbra.ans.net
<quattro@coimbra.ans.net>
Date: Friday, April 16, 1999 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: H&R vs Eibach, which for 4kq?


>On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Pat Martin wrote:
>
>> I had heard just the opposite.  When I installed the H&R setup on my car
it
>> lowered it about 7/8".   My experience has been the Eibachs are less
>> progressive and a little stiffer from the get go.  The h&r's catch up but
>> only when you are in the corner.  Personally for a street car I like more
>> progressive.
>> Pat Martin
>
>But is that 7/8" from stock height (ie. pre-sagging stage)?  H&R specs
>list a 1.5" drop f/r, while the Eibach lists 1"/.75" f/r.
>
>Windows NT crashed.                          ICQ 9059481
>I am the Blue Screen of Death.            For PGP public key:
>No one hears your screams.             finger mchang@ece.nwu.edu
>
>
>