[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Now engine swap, was 85 UrQ!!

To: "Nick Bean" <mktnb@2bean.com>, "---> Bob" <mx@snet.net>
Subject: Re: Now engine swap, was 85 UrQ!!
From: Ian Haddock <ian@nanospace.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 17:11:02 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: <quattro@audifans.com>
In-Reply-To: <015101bf09e5$7c356ca0$5de8e3cf@cnw>
References: <BBF46448A508D2118CCA00805F156E9302727440@XCH-CPC-01><379F4804.67DE0FB4@snet.net>
Sender: owner-quattro@audifans.com

/lurk mode off

Mmm. Wait a year and see what becomes of the unloved rotory! I'm
moonlighting this list to see if I'm willing to give up my rotory for
quattro power.... I still dream of a 4kcstq. <sigh>

btw, the rotory will be back, 225-250hp non-turbo later this year /
early 2000. The cars that go Mmmmmmm. =)

/lurk mode on

At 7:13 PM -0000 9/28/99, Nick Bean wrote:
>Surely you don't mean the 13B twin rotor Wankel of Rx4/7 fame, do you?
>
>Nick Bean
>
>
>>If its weight/hp we're looking for, then I vote for the 13B!!
>>
>>Bob

_________________

When 900 years you reach, look as good you will not....
Ian Haddock - ian@nanospace.com - 8813BT - 200mhz603e

References:
- Now engine swap, was 85 UrQ!!
  - From: "Lewis, Gary M" <Gary.Lewis@West.Boeing.com>
- Re: Now engine swap, was 85 UrQ!!
  - From: "---> Bob" <mx@snet.net>
- Re: Now engine swap, was 85 UrQ!!
  - From: "Nick Bean" <mktnb@2bean.com>

Prev by Date: re: ChipTuning Results
Next by Date: 17" wheels on a 4ksq question
Prev by thread: Re: Now engine swap, was 85 UrQ!!
Next by thread: Re: Now engine swap, was 85 UrQ!!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread